TUC Women’s Conference, Scarborough,
9 - 11th March 2005
Guests & Speakers included -
Violet A. Essu - Oil & Gas Union in Basra, Iraq.
Fatma Mehdi - Secretary General of the Western Sahara Women’s Union.
Poonam Joshi - Amnesty International UK.
Jeannie Drake - TUC President.
Helen Jackson - MP.
Brendan Barber - TUC General Secretary.
Christine Hay - Co-operative Women’s Guild.
Yemisi Ilesanmi - Nigeria Labour Congress & Chair of ICFTU Youth Committee.
Margaret Bauman - Chair of Congress Women’s Committee, ICTU.NI.
Barbara Limon - Employment Policy Officer, Equal Opportunities Commission.
Janet Cassidy - Scottish TUC Women’s Committee.
Fire Brigades Delegation - Ruth Winters President, Vicky
Knight EC Member, Dona Feltham NWC Chair, Kerry Baigent NWC Secretary, Janette
Ferguson NWC Region 1, Jo Winrow-Jones NWC Region 5, Staci Leach NWC Region
6, Patsy Griffith G & L Region 6, Sally Harper NWC Region 9.
Dona spoke in support of - Pensions – Age & Gender
Discrimination.
Dona says in 1999 the Government carried out a Thematic Review and targets were
set for the Fire Service to achieve a workforce of 15% women and 7% Black &
Ethnic Minorities by 2009. To date we have achieved 4.5% women and 0.09% Black
& Ethnic Minorities - Haven’t we done well!! I don’t think so!!
At the same time with a stroke of a pen a plan was being hatched by the same
Government to obliterate the careers of Professional Operational Emergency Fire
Control Staff, who are predominantly women. They plan to reduce the 58 Emergency
Fire Controls that we currently have in the UK to 9. Reducing the number of
Controls will obviously reduce the opportunities for Emergency Fire Control
Staff to progress in their chosen careers. In addition to these brutal Public
Sector cuts, our employers are currently trying to implement an Integrated Personal
Development System, which is basically vocational training designed to make
each individual responsible for their own progress. By default it will allow
the ever invisible ‘ glass ceiling ‘ to be surreptitiously and corporately
applied to the detriment of Control Staff who have always been undervalued and
underpaid as Emergency Fire Control work has always been seen as ‘ women’s
work ‘.
Janette spoke in support of - Women’s Oppression &
Gender Stereotyping.
Janette says being a member of a “ young “ union with a diverse
lead officials team, women in the Fire Service can easily be convinced that
we have it all. We compare our position in society and at work to the positions
of our mothers and grandmothers before us and we think that things are good
for us. After all, we are firefighters, we think that we are accepted and for
women firefighters our pay is equal to that of the men. It is easy for us to
continue with our eyes shut and think that we have reached a position of equality.
Sometimes, it takes time for us to realise that we have in fact become surrogate
men. In our so called modernized Fire Service our Emergency Fire Control Operators
still do not receive the same pay as firefighters, and also 79% of our Emergency
Fire Control Operators are women. I think this tells us something!!
An important part of the Fire Brigades Union’s pay claim was for Emergency
Fire Control Operators to achieve equal pay status. This was reviewed and increased,
but the pay is still only 95% of a firefighters wage. I stand by the fact that
the job an Emergency Fire Control Operator does is of equal importance to that
of a firefighter and as such should be paid equally.
This is why the ‘ Charter for Women ‘ ( see page ) represents something
very exciting for the women in the Fire Brigades Union. It gives women a campaigning
focus and shows us how far we still have to go, not just in the workplace, but
in society as a whole.
The Charter highlights the many arena’s that women still need to do battle
in to achieve the recognition we deserve, and it makes us proud to be women.
The National Women’s Committee of the FBU did not hesitate to adopt the
Charter wholeheartedly. Not just because of the obvious workplace issues that
we are constantly battling against, but also as a progressive union we are involved
in many campaigns outside the workplace. Our women’s committee is committed
to tackling the three broad areas of the Charter, Social Policy – the
Labour Market – and the Labour Movement.
Oh! and just in case you aren’t sure, we are women who are proud to be
part of this revitalised fight for women’s liberation.
After 2 1/2 years in industrial action, we needed to revisit our radical views,
explore our ‘ selfish side ‘ and remember the many victories that
were won at the expense of women and just to realize it’s time to prioritise
our ‘ women’s ‘ issues.
In a male dominated industry like ours, our agenda will never be popular, but
that is not a reason to stop progressing it.
Patsy seconded motion 12 - Flexible Working.
Patsy says as a mother of three and a young one at that!! I had no real chance
of getting very far when it came to getting on let alone climbing the career
ladder. The only jobs open to me ( in reality ) were part-time, low paid ones
– with very little or no career prospects. Now there’s
nothing wrong with that if that’s what you want, I wanted more!!
Now I know for a fact that I didn’t and don’t stand
alone on this.
I didn’t have a family, or friends who were able or willing to help -
in fact – much of them were in the same position and suffering the dilemma’s
that I was. Even if the help and support were there why should I or any other
woman ask or require it??
I wanted to have the choice, to be able to go out to work in a challenging,
fulfilling job and have the means to be able to get a mortgage.
Despite the fact that I was competent and had skills, drive and ambitions, I
was unable to use these skills purely because of the unreasonable and impractical
hours I was asked to work.
So, I had to choose – I chose my longing, my desire, my need to raise
my children, to be there for my children before my longing, my desire, my need
to have a career – not that the latter was any less important. I wanted
to be there for my kids, and my kids wanted me there. The one thing that was
preventing me from having both – which I may add, isn’t asking for
too much, were the inflexible working hours. I waited and waited until my kids
were older.
23 years have passed since I gave birth to my first child and the same obstacles
are still there. So, it infuriates me as an employee in the Fire Service –
as a Firefighter, that my employers still don’t take the issue of flexible
working seriously. In fact the Fire Service Employers, both locally and nationally
will use anything to attack workers.
In an industry where women make up only 4.5% of the workforce, our employers
have made our lives even harder than it already was, and that’s at a time
when our employers had a real opportunity to put women’s issues on the
agenda – ( they didn’t ) – issues such as maternity, rights
to a toilet & shower in the workplace, uniform that fits, and to send a
message that harassment and bullying
will not be tolerated and of course take a serious position on working flexibly.
They chose instead, to use women as a tool, to change shift a pattern that actually
works, and women workers stated in a survey carried out by the FBU National
Women’s Committee is conducive to a family friendly life.
We don’t accept that to change a 2day 2 night 3 off shift pattern to 6
days of 8 to 4, or 6 days of 4 to midnight or midnight to 8 as a better system
in terms of family friendly, yet this is the system they are putting before
us as an option. It’s got nothing to do with improving the working lives
of women, but has a lot to do with the downgrading and degeneration of the British
Fire Service.
At present when a woman firefighter applies for flexible working hours within
their present role, they are refused. Instead they are offered an alternative
shift pattern – and I use that word very loosely – an alternative
shift pattern in line with their Brigades ‘ Modernisation Plan ‘
and are left with the impossible situation of their own personal need forcing
them to participate in the unacceptable cuts being made. This is not what we
mean when we request flexible working – I know I didn’t wait for
23 years for this – don’t let our employers use and abuse us any
longer.
Jo Winrow-Jones in support of Motion 15 – Defending Public
Services.
Jo says the importance of ‘ speed and weight of attack ‘ had always
been the theory behind fighting any fire.
I’m a firefighter and we have always responded to your 999 calls quickly
and with enough staff to carry out the task safely. We’d slide down the
fire station pole and under blue lights and with sirens blaring, 2 fire engines
would speed to the fire reported at your home.
It’s 4 in the morning and on our arrival your neighbour states that you
must still be in the house. We sledge hammer door open and pulse a spray of
water to assess the temperature and protect our entry. 2 firefighters will search
for your probably now unconscious body upstairs whilst the 2 firefighters downstairs
will control the fire conditions to prevent a flashover. Too much water on the
fire will scald not only the firefighters, but you lying on the bedroom floor.
The remaining staff outside will be ready to put up a ladder should the crews
inside need to escape via an upstairs window. They are also part of our safe
system of work, monitoring how long the crews have been inside, ensuring a constant
supply of water and necessary equipment, including a resuscitation set for when
we carry you to fresh air.
The fire will then be extinguished and the damage kept to a minimum. This all
can sometimes happen in minutes. ‘ speed and weight of
attack ‘ But the thinking has changed. Reform, modernisation,
whatever euphenism you want to use has replaced a once reactionary service with
a new pro-active service. Community Fire Safety has meant that the fire
awareness education in our communities has improved and many homes have now
been fitted with a free smoke alarm.
Initiatives the Fire Brigades Union applaud. But,
what if you still have a fire??
The national standards of fire cover are gone!! They dictated speed of response
to any type of fire incident. Not any more!! On the advice of you Chief Fire
Officer, the Fire Authority decides!! Section 19 was repealed!! This process
gave your community a democratic right to challenge any proposed cuts to you
fire service. Not any more!! again, the Chief Fire Officer advises the Fire
Authority.
A fire call to your home can now be responded to with one fire appliance with
only 4 or 5 firefighters.
So, what has happened to our safe system of work?? Well we can call for assistance
if we arrive at an incident which requires more staff, but how long does that
take to arrive??
I am told not to enter a fire unless there is another crew available to help
me in case things go wrong, but their 5 minutes away and you are lying on that
bedroom floor. What do you want me to do?? Obvious!! But I’ll be compromising
my own health and safety. Who will be controlling the fire downstairs?? We are
now being told by our employers, when there is a fatality that “ they
were probably dead before the crews left the station “ My last Chief Fire
Officer said, “ people were either dead or dying within the first four
minutes, so what’s the rush “. My current Chief Fire Officer claims
“ the 5th firefighter on that fire appliance is only there to feed the
horses “, referring to the fire service of the early 20th century and
extremely offensive. He wants to get rid of 150 frontline firefighters
in Merseyside.!!
Smoke alarms will never put fires out!! They can compliment the service we deliver,
but they can’t replace it!!
Have you ever phoned for the police or ambulance, the wait can be hours, sometimes
days for the police.
Prioritising 999 calls is something we too have begun in the fire service.
There is no doubt – fire deaths will increase, firefighters
deaths will increase.
What’s happened to your Fire Station?? Are there plans to downgrade it
from 2 pumps to 1 pump?? Or, from wholetime to retained?? Make it your business
to find out, it may matter one night!!
The Fire Service is being well and truly ‘ reformed ‘ we have, IRMP,
TRV, SART, IPDS, ICCT, IMT, USART, CLMT, IRU, GRA, and a lot of S.H.I.T!!
Vicky spoke in support of motion 26 – General Council
– Equalities Seats.
Vicky asks, that conference notes that, at present, the equalities seats on
the General Council, section D – J, are elected at TUC Annual Congress
and that we believe that the equality conferences are the correct electoral
constituency for these seats. The Women’s committee should therefore be
instructed to liase with other TUC equality committees in order to progress
a reform of TUC procedures, allowing for the elections of the seats in Sections
D – J by the appropriate equality conferences.
Ruth moved the FBU’s motion – Regionalisation of
Emergency Fire Control Rooms.
Ruth said, this conference should be aware of the Governments proposals to reduce
the number of control rooms in England and Wales from 49 to 9 and in Scotland
from 8 to 1. The FBU firmly believes that these proposals forms part of New
Labour’s political agenda on regionalisation and is in no way based on
improving the Fire Service. This conference should note that this political
policy on regionalisation was overwhelmingly rejected by the public in the North
East Referendum held in November 2004.
Should these proposals be implemented there will be job losses of 47% within
Emergency Fire Control Rooms where women are the majority workforce.
This Conference should also note that these proposals will have a negative impact
on the highly efficient service provided by the Fire & Rescue Service throughout
the UK and would result in an increased risk to both Firefighters and the public.
Therefore this conference calls on the TUC and all affiliates to oppose the
Governments proposals on the Regionalisation of Emergency Fire Controls by :
i) supporting the FBU’s national campaign.
ii) publicising the FBU campaign entitled “ Campaign Against Regionalisation “; and
iii) lobbying Government, MP’s and Local Councillor’s to oppose this initiative.
Ruth seconded Emergency Resolution 1 – Public
Sector Pension Dispute.
Ruth said - the present government’s attacks on Pensions, affects an unprecedented
number of the public sector. In terms of the FBU it’s not just the occupational
Firefighters Pension Scheme in the Fire Service being attacked but also includes
our Emergency Fire Control Section ( who are members of the Local Government’s
Pension Scheme ), they make up 1,500 of our members, 76% of whom are women and
constitute almost half the women in the Fire Service, they are totally opposed
to the present attacks on the ‘ 85 rule ‘, the decrease in our financial
security and the extension to our working life.
All detrimental changes from a Government who talks of choice whilst clearly
giving us none!! We have a policy of long standing that these members should
be in the Firefighters Pension Scheme – we did extensive research, we
found that our Emergency Staff retired early through ill-health significantly
more often than any comparable workers in local government, our mortality rate
after retiring is significantly higher than any comparable group of workers
in local government – we put our case to – our
proven case – it was rejected – why?? Because
not enough of us exists, apparently – too small a group to use as a study
group – ludicrous!! – a perverse argument?? But we commit
to do all we can to support the many and varied forms of action with other unions
on the 23rd March. We hope it’s not the only action but the first of many,
if necessary.
The proposed changes to the firefighters pensions scheme would bring it more
into line with the Local Government Pension Scheme and away from the historic
match with the Police Pension Scheme, the FBU believe that this misrepresents
the role of the firefighter, even if the change in role of firefighters arising
from the Fire & Rescue Services Act 2004 are accepted ‘ Firefighting
remains a dangerous job ‘, even if firefighters adopt an increased
fire safety responsibility.
In the existing scheme the normal retirement age for firefighters is 50, if
they have 25 years service or more, otherwise it is age 55. The proposal is
that this will be changed to age 55 for everyone. It must be borne in mind that
firefighters have a shorter life expectancy than other public sector employees.
The OPDM says that improved working practices means that this will not be true
in the future, but members in the current scheme are precisely the people who
were working when the job was less safe than it is now. Their life expectancy
has not suddenly gone up. Police Officers will still be able
to retire at 50. Why shouldn’t Firefighters??
Conference these are the facts for both groups of members within the FBU. But,
we all know none of us can let this attack go by, although the timescale for
our proposed changes are later than some others, we are building our action,
including strike action if necessary, for a pre-election strategy and will be
liasing with any other union who will be doing the same after 23rd March. Meanwhile,
we commit to any support and participation required to assist other unions mobilising
earlier.
Sisters, we cannot afford to miss this opportunity to react, ( because the Government
certainly will ), and react effectively and together with full TUC support.
Whilst unions taking action in isolation shouldn’t and I’m, sure
wont be ruled out, we can tell you from experience, this government will do
as much as they can to stop us. They’ll use different tactics to the Tories,
but they’ll pick you off and destroy you. We can’t let that happen.
We need to mobilise together!! React together!! and
ultimately Act together!! and continue to act together
until we effect the changes we as working women and men want. Because, if this
move succeeds, it will be the beginning of a rolling programme.
Sisters, our women’s section use a quote from ‘ Maya Angelou ‘
as our guiding theme and it’s never been more pertinent than in this debate
- “ Women - ask for what you want and be prepared to
get it “ This government is not planning for Pensions Choice
it’s imposing future pensions parity.
Vicky moved Emergency Motion 2 – Western Sahara.
Sisters, much has happened throughout the world since I last stood at this conference
and spoke on the issue of the Western Sahara, it was in fact 2001. I wish that
I could report that much has changed there since then – unfortunately
I cannot.
A majority of the Saharawi people continue to live as refugees, where women,
children and the elderly make up 80% of the population. Living in 4 large tented
communities 200,000 Saharwi refugees have been struggling to survive in one
of the most inhospitable desert environments in the world, where temperatures
soar above 130 degrees F in the summer and plummets to below 0 degrees in the
winter. Flash floods, violent sirocco winds and locust invasions wreak havoc
and devastation.
Sisters, for decades now, the Saharawi people have been denied the right to
self-determination. This desert people formerly lived under Spanish rule for
90 years, but in 1966 the United Nations General Assembly began calling for
the right of the Saharwi people to exercise self-determination by a referendum
in Western Sahara. Instead of fulfilling these historic rights, in 1975, the
Saharwi people experienced the Moroccan invasion of their homeland in North
West Africa, beginning 3 decades of oppressive rule, and the
cultural genocide of a nation.
The Moroccan occupation in Western Sahara resulted in the division of the Saharwi
population – those who live under Moroccan rule - and those who live in
the camps run by the Polisario Front.
This division is reinforced by a Moroccan built defensive wall ( ring any bells!!
) stretching 1,690 miles, fortified by 10 million land mines and staffed by
100,000 soldiers.
In 1991, after 16 years of war, both Morocco and the Polisario Front agreed
to allow the UN to broker a cease-fire in order to hold a self-determination
referendum for the Saharawi’s by early 1992, in that they would choose
between independence – or, integration with Morocco.
Every independent commentator forecast that there would be an overwhelming vote
for independence – the reason why the Moroccan Regime has blocked the
whole process. They refuse to co-operate with the letter and spirit of the referendum
process – and as a result there is no agreed register of electors and
no agreement on the rights of the refugees. Now in defiance of UN resolutions,
the King of Morocco has – in his regal way – pronounced on the issue
of Western Sahara on 16th January this year, that neither he, or the Moroccan
people will ever agree to give up sovereignty in Western Sahara.
What if Sadam Hussein had said this in relation to Kuwait or Iraq’s weapons
of mass destruction and, what have the International Community done to enforce
it’s policy? Very little in fact – no real pressure on Morocco to
abide by the Rule of Law.
The Western Sahara is rich in minerals and it serves the interests
of the rich and powerful in Morocco to deploy 100,000 troops to militarily defend
the ‘ Politically Indefensible ‘. Sisters, the Western
Sahara is Africa’s last colony, it’s people are living in poverty
and oppression, with the majority in Refugee Camps.
We need to take action now!! We urge all affiliated
unions to do what they can to redouble efforts to end Moroccan tyranny. The
UK Government can be a force for progress at G8 level, where we hold the chair
this year and at EU level, in trade agreements with Morocco.
We can make a difference Sisters. Lets press Government to put pressure on
Morocco, lets highlight the plight of the Saharwi people to our members, our
MP’s – in fact anyone who will listen. Get your unions to support
the “ Sandblast “ Campaign – financially and with member involvement.
Next year is the 30th anniversary of the occupation. Lets mark
it with action not words.
Staci spoke in support of Emergency Motion 3 – Abortion Rights.
The Women’s right to choose is one of the most fundamental rights we have
as women. The right – within legal timescales – to have absolute
control over our own bodies, our own minds and our own future.
The challenges and pressure facing women at the most vulnerable time in their
whole existence cannot and will not be assisted by the increase in US opposition
and staunch ‘ Christian Fundamentalism ‘ all dressed up to look
pretty. “ The Global Gag “.
Sisters, the FBU Women’s Committee took this motion to our own Union’s
Annual Conference last year, this is now FBU Policy for all our members. Sisters,
get your own branches, committees and unions to affiliate, donate, promote ‘
Abortion Rights ‘. Keep Women’s choices their own!!
One in three women will have an abortion in her lifetime.
10% of GP’s declare themselves conscientious objectors.
less than 1% of abortions are carried out after 22 weeks.
But if you, any of you, sisters for whatever reasons –
are one of those 1 in 3 women?
have an unsympathetic GP?
is time running out for you?
You need, you deserve, and we will preserve the
campaign to defend and extend abortion rights.
Jo Winrow-Jones spoke at the Pleniary Session -
Jo was asked to speak about the problems, both past and present in union membership,
particularly women. Jo says, FBU members join on first day in the job in groups
of new trainees, usually 2 groups, either firefighters ( predominantly white
men ) and Emergency Fire Control Staff ( predominantly women ). Out of 53,000
members, there are only 2,500 women, 1,300 Women Firefighters and 1,200 Emergency
Fire Control Staff. Emergency Control Staff have had an EC member for over 25
years, but there were barriers to their involvement eg., overworked, understaffed,
no TU leave, no childcare provisions, ( that is something that our Women’s
Committee has changed and cascaded down ), stereotyped in women’s role
in workplace, not encouraged to venture out, undervalued / demoralized.
When women ( wholetime ) firefighters started joining in numbers, they held
informal meetings to discuss women’s issues, which they had discovered
were not always being dealt with. Formal structures of equality sections agreed
in 1998. Brigade, Regional and National Offices then had women reps. 2002 -
Women got their own EC member to vote for their issues and 2003 – 3 Resolutions
were taken to FBU Annual Conference by Women’s Committee.
Our Committee has 15 women relying on TU leave, our initial focus – justifying
our own existence within our own union.
Last year we revisited our agenda, we acknowledged that in focusing on being
high profile, we had little time left to devote to our women members. This had
to change!!
We have all the usual problems, inactivity, apathy, thatcher’s children,
political climate, coupled with women not putting heads above the parapet in
our trade, as much as we’d like them to – yes - that means you!!
Women blend in, deny being women, tolerate appalling conditions, even argue
against the existence of a women’s committee. Those being bullied, are
being bullied at the hands of FBU members, few women’s rep’s in
mainstream – encourage other women to become branch officials, and they
seem to get more credibility and support when they are working for women’s
committee. Don’t get bogged down in women attending meetings, focus on
doing stuff that women members can see is directly of benefit to them. Eg.,
facilities audit – important issue – directly affects them –
questionnaires require their participation – excellent response. We’ve
made a commitment to progress this issue any way we can.
To sum up –
Consider why women don’t join or become active.
Be honest how your own union may contribute to this.
Active feminism can sometimes be intimidating and make you feel inadequate.
Is you union structure inclusive.
What can you do to make women see that the union will make a
difference to them – actually achieve an improvement in their working
conditions.
Have a very long term plan, realistically women won’t get involved overnight,
don’t take it personally when they don’t.
Don’t send men to recruit new women members.
Provide childcare when you expect women to attend and finally –
Be sisterly to each other, why get involved if existing active women are bitchy.
Sally then had the honour and responsibility to move the
vote of thanks by congratulating everyone from the chair of this year’s
conference, the TUC Women’s Committee all the guests, visitors, delegates,
stall holders who all contributed to a very successful conference and finally
to the staff of the Spa in Scarborough without whom this event could not have
taken place.
©
Fire Brigades Union
Bradley House, 68 Coombe Road, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, KT2 7AE
Published by Fire Brigades Union National Women's Committee